Research · benchmarks · open methods

Measure what makes agentic systems useful.

AgenticForge Labs studies the efficiency, reliability, and practical behavior of the same digital, generative, and physical systems we build. The goal is evidence that helps us choose architectures and models deliberately—not just impressive demos.

TokensWork per taskTotal usage, reasoning, and tool-loop overhead
LatencyTime to useful workModel, provider, and long-running trace behavior
CacheReuse that mattersHow persistent context changes repeated-work economics
CostCapability per dollarEnd-to-end workflow efficiency, not API price alone

Forge Bench

Efficiency is an engineering constraint.

Forge Bench examines agentic workloads as complete computational systems. We track more than a single prompt and response: token use across long-running traces, latency, cache behavior, provider differences, tool calls, task completion, and cost. Our first public release combines two complementary five-task studies and publishes the run records, raw traces, analysis code, and figures needed to inspect the result.

Define→Run→Trace→Measure→Compare→Repeat

Token efficiency

Measure the whole trace

Count the work consumed across reasoning, context, tool use, retries, and repeated turns so apparent model efficiency can be compared with actual agent workload.

Latency & caching

Speed depends on the workflow

Track response time, provider behavior, and cache reuse across persistent tasks where repeated context can materially change both speed and cost.

Cost & capability

Optimize useful work, not the cheapest token

Relate total workflow cost to task completion and quality so model routing can be designed around the work that needs to happen.

Reproducibility

Treat agent evaluation like an experiment

Use controlled tasks, repeated runs, explicit factors, stored traces, and transparent analysis so conclusions can be challenged and reproduced.

Research release · September 2026

AI efficiency depends on the system around the model.

The first public Forge Bench release combines two five-task SWE-bench Verified studies across four Hermes harness conditions. The pooled package contains 80 joined run records plus raw traces, derived tables, analysis code, and figures. The result is not a universal model ranking; it is evidence that cache economics and model × tool interactions can materially change real coding-agent cost and speed.

Cache economics DeepSeek V4.1 Flash baseline stayed cost-effective

Headline token prices were not the bill

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash used roughly similar total mixed-token volume to the DeepSeek V4 Flash baseline, but much cheaper cache reads kept its estimated baseline cost lower in this cache-heavy workload.

Measured intervention 48% lower cost · 32% lower wall time

DeepSeek V4 Flash + Ponytail

Relative to the DeepSeek V4 Flash baseline, Ponytail substantially reduced token use and produced lower pooled estimates for both cost and time.

Interaction The benefit did not transfer cleanly

Model × tool interaction matters

Ponytail did not help DeepSeek V4.1 Flash in the same way, and Caveman + Ponytail did not show a reliable additive gain. Agent optimizations need to be tested with the models and providers that actually run them.

Forge Bench focused comparison of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash baseline, DeepSeek V4 Flash baseline, and DeepSeek V4 Flash with Ponytail showing mixed token use, estimated cost, and wall time
Focused pooled comparison. Lower cost and wall time are better; token bars show input, output, and cached components. Intervals are wide, so the release emphasizes reproducible interactions rather than a universal ranking.

Across the Forge

One measurement discipline, three axes of work.

Forge Bench begins with model and agent efficiency, then extends the same experimental approach across the primary technical directions of AgenticForge Labs.

01

Digital agency

Agents & orchestration

Context, memory, routing, tool use, long-running work, reliability, and the compute required to complete useful tasks.

02

Generative systems

Persistent creation

Continuity, provenance, iteration cost, model handoffs, media-pipeline throughput, and how creative state survives across generations.

03

Physical agency

Robotics & fabrication

Perception-to-action latency, task success, recovery, hardware utilization, validation, and safe handoffs between probabilistic reasoning and deterministic control.

Open where we can be

Research is more useful when it can be inspected.

The persistent AgenticForge runtime remains proprietary core technology. Around it, we intend to publish benchmark methods, selected traces and datasets, interfaces, SDKs, adapters, reference implementations, and analysis where doing so is practical, safe, and compatible with licensing and partner obligations.

Open principle Methods before marketing.

We want public results to include enough context to understand how they were produced: task definitions, relevant configurations, measurement assumptions, and limitations.

How the open ecosystem fits the runtime →

Public code

Early software from the lab.

Public research software is released early enough to be useful and inspected. Status labels matter: these projects are evolving, and hardware-facing code should be tested conservatively.

Public repository

Research

Forge Bench

A reproducible framework for randomized studies of AI coding-agent harnesses and models, with complete long-running traces, SWE-bench outcomes, token and cost accounting, timing decomposition, tool-use analysis, multivariate analysis, and auditable study packages.

Public repository

Beta

SO-ARM101 Motion SDK

A focused Python motion SDK for the five-axis SO-ARM101 follower arm and stock gripper, with joint motion, forward/inverse kinematics, Cartesian movement, tools/TCPs, diagnostics, workspace checks, simulation, and an optional desktop controller. ROS and LeRobot are not runtime dependencies.

Progressive release

More to come

Open components as they are ready.

Only repositories that are actually public are listed here. Additional robot interfaces and reusable components will appear as they are prepared for public use.

Build, measure, publish, improve.

Research connects the systems we build with the evidence needed to make them more efficient, reproducible, and dependable.

Across AgenticForge Labs

Research and creative worlds.

Two brands apply our engineering work to different kinds of discovery and making.

Phenotyper logo

Scientific imaging & robotics

Phenotyper

Imaging instruments and agent-ready robotic systems for plant and microbial research.

Explore Phenotyper ↗
Forge Born emblem

Creative worlds & production

AgenticForge Studio

AI-expanded worlds and generative production, with Forge Born as its original story world.

Explore Studio · Forge Born →